Flaws and weaken/strengthen
Practice diagnosing argument flaws and shifting conclusions.
Strengthen and weaken questions test your ability to diagnose the argument gap and predict what would help or hurt it. The best answers do not add random facts. They directly affect the link between evidence and conclusion. If you can state the gap in one sentence, these questions become predictable.
- Describe the error, not the topic
- Weaken attacks the missing link
- Strengthen supports the missing link
- Causation and sampling flaws are common
- Label the flaw type during review
Pick one LR question you missed. Identify the flaw type and write one sentence explaining how you would fix the argument.
Generate a quiz from this lesson content.
Step-by-step math problem solving.
Official LSAT prep overview from LSAC (link-only).
Some lessons include links to external educational resources such as Khan Academy® or other independent providers. These resources remain hosted on their own platforms under their original licenses. UnCram does not charge for or redistribute this content and does not imply partnership, sponsorship, or endorsement by any external provider.
LSAT® is a registered trademark of the Law School Admission Council (LSAC). UnCram is not affiliated with or endorsed by LSAC.